I ran one detailed pattern at 100 mm/sec and the same pattern at 500 mm/sec, and took some pictures so I can compare the resulting drawings.
Here You Go
100 mm/sec, acceleration 10k mm/sec^2, jerk 200 mm/sec, 190 minutes drawing time
500 mm/sec, acceleration 10k mm/sec^2, jerk 200 mm/sec, 38 minutes drawing time
100 mm/sec, acceleration 10k mm/sec^2, jerk 200 mm/sec
Conclusion
Yes, loss of detail as expected. Is it acceptable? I guess it depends on which aspect of the table's performance interests you. If you're more interested in the final pattern, go slow and maximize detail. If you're more interested in the process of drawing the image, go fast!
Note: acceleration is high at 10k mm/sec^2. That ensures that regardless of speed, the drawing time will be minimized because most drawn segments will hit the target speed. That also tends to cause the ball to throw sand at the start of each new segment as the ball rapidly accelerates to the target speed. Throwing the sand (onto previously drawn lines) is one way that detail is lost when running at high speeds such as the example here.
One last thing, because who doesn't like cat videos?
Goodness, that is some wonderful work. And the video with the kitty is priceless!
ReplyDelete