Saturday, November 23, 2024

Restoring a Pair of Infinity Beta 50 Speakers

I was scanning Craig's List a while ago and found a listing for a pair of Infinity Beta 50 speakers that looked pretty good. I checked specs and reviews and found they were new around 2004 or so, making them 20 years old. They are floor standing towers that have two 8" bass drivers each, so they are capable of producing a satisfying amount of bass down to 30 Hz. 

Review #1

Review #2

Review #3

I dug up a manual on the speakers, some info on the CMMD (ceramic metal matrix diaphragm) drivers, and tech specs that include the crossover schematic. You can access all of that here.

The boxes are MDF covered in a black wood-grain vinyl that has seen better days- they were a bit dinged up especially at the bottom front edges, and one speaker had some "water"  damage where the joint between the side and bottom was splitting open. The seller hooked them up they speakers sounded OK, so I bought them with the intention of fixing up the cabinets. The seller didn't have the grill covers for them. I paid $125 for the pair.


Area affected by "water"- when MDF gets wet it swells up and then stays that way when it dries out. Whose idea was it to use this crap to make speakers?


An inside look at the water damaged area. It looks like a couple corner braces went missing, too. I replaced them with a couple wood blocks.


Damaged top-front edge. Both speakers were about the same. You can see the seam where the front panel was glued to the rest of the cabinet after the vinyl was applied to both.


Damaged bottom front edge- both speakers were about the same.


One bass driver had a dented dust cap, and a tiny dent near the edge of the cone. Not much can be done about that. Fortunately it doesn't affect performance. Grill covers would have been nice to hide this. Maybe I'll print some...


When I got them home I opened them up to check the interior and found a large handful of dog food inside one of them. I can think of a couple possibilities- either a rodent was stashing food inside the speaker, or maybe a little kid was playing with the dog food and dropped it in via the bass port on the back of the speaker. I didn't find any rodent poop, so I'll go with the latter explanation.


Some of the dog food can be seen here. Note- stuffing on only one side of each cabinet. Hmmm.


Recapping the crossovers


The crossovers had the usual cheapo parts- three nonpolarized electrolytic caps and four iron core inductors. I ordered replacements for the caps from Parts Express for a total of about $27 for both speakers. Considering the condition of the speakers, it's probably not worth upgrading the inductors to air core parts or the caps to film type. C4 and L5 that connect at the tweeter are film and air core parts.


It was nice of Infinity to provide such a helpful schematic! The numbers in the boxes on the right side are the sizes of the spade connectors on the ends of the wires (inches, of course!). They used different sizes so it would be impossible to connect the drivers with the wrong polarity.



One of the crossovers before I recapped it. The bass and mid/treble are set up for biamp/biwiring. There are three electrolytic caps (C1, C2, and C3) on the board.


When the parts arrived I opened up the speakers and got to work. The wires use spade type connectors at the drivers with the other end soldered to the crossover board. You have to remove and disconnect both bass drivers, the midrange driver, and the connector plate in order to get the crossover into position where you can work on it. The wires are color coded and the spade lugs on the + and - terminals of the drivers are different sizes, so it would be very hard to make a mistake when putting things back together.


Recapped crossover. Note the 30 uF cap (C2) is made by wiring two 15 uF caps in parallel and the 18.5 uF cap (C3) is made from a 17 uF and a 1.5 uF cap wired in parallel. The original caps were glued to the PCB, and you can't see it in this picture, but before positioning the new caps on the PCB I put a healthy beads of hot melt glue down at each cap location to minimize vibration that could cause microphonics.


While I had the crossovers out I measured the resistance of the four iron core coils, in case anyone wants to try rebuilding the crossovers with air core coils. Values are as follows:

L1:  0.81 Ohms

L2: 0.45 Ohms

L3: 0.58 Ohms

L4: 0.56 Ohms

If you replace the iron core coils with air core parts, you'll have trouble matching the exact resistances of the original coils. However, if you use coils with lower resistance, I don't think there's going to be any negative effect. I did some digging at Madisound and Parts Express and found most of the parts are cheapest at Parts Express. Among the parts I found, there are film caps that cost $10 and same-value film caps that cost $90. I wouldn't spend $90 for one cap. It can't possibly make that much difference in the performance of the speaker. If I were willing to spend so much that $90 caps wouldn't bother me, I'd probably just build an active crossover and bi- or tri-amp the speakers instead.

Here are the lowest cost air core inductors and film caps I found for the bass and midrange crossovers. The tweeter crossover already has an air core inductor and film cap, so no need to change anything there. Parts listed are for one speaker.

LF crossover, 600 Hz, 3rd order (18 dB/octave):

Jantzen 2.7 mH 18 gauge DCR=0.92 Ohms   $17.05 

Dayton 0.5 mH 18 gauge DCR=0.33 Ohms  $4.40

Solen 68 uF  film cap    $30.98

Total: $52.43

Mid/High crossover 3.3 kHz, 2nd order (12 dB/octave)

Dayton DPMC 30 uF film cap  $7.39

Dayton DPMC 18 uF film cap  $4.59

Jantzen 0.68 mH 15 gauge DCR=0.24 Ohms $17.44

Jantzen 0.75 mH 18 gauge DCR=0.42 Ohms $6.71

Total: $36.13

So the per speaker. the total would be $88.56, not including cost of a new PCB if needed to accommodate these much larger parts. 

You could lower the cost a bit by winding the coils yourself. You'd have to buy the wire and make or buy forms to wind it on, and then have some means to test to make sure you've got the right inductance. There's a calculator here that will tell you the amount of wire required for a specified inductance and form size, and calculates its resistance. Copper magnet wire runs about $20-25 per lb on ebay. For reference, the 2.7 mH inductor uses about 1/2 lb of 18 gauge wire, and more copper when using larger diameter wire to get lower resistance.

If I were going to be restoring speakers and rebuilding/improving crossovers on a regular basis, I'd probably design and build (3D print) a coil winding machine powered by my electric drill and buy wire in bulk on 5-10 lb spools.


Tweeters


When I listened to these speakers before I bought them, all the drivers were producing clean sound. After listening to them at home for a while, I decided that the tweeter output wasn't what I would have expected. I did some research and found out they used ferrofluid, and that it gets gummy over time and affects the performance of the driver. I looked up the part number and emailed Harmon International about the possibility of ordering a pair of them. They emailed back asking for my address and promptly sent me a pair of the tweeters for free! I installed them and listened to the speakers again and now the high frequency output was what I expected it to be.


Cabinet Rework


I pulled all the drivers, crossovers and stuffing out of them, then peeled the vinyl off to assess the damage and make cabinet repairs. I used a razor knife to cut the vinyl into 2-4" wide strips before attempting to peel it off the speaker boxes.  One speaker had some "water" damage, so I chiseled and ground off some of the MDF and used bondo wood filler to replace it, did the same for the damage at the front edges and any other dings, and the seam between the front panel and the rest of the cabinet, then sanded everything smooth.


I attacked the worst one first. This one has the "water" damage at the bottom of the cabinet. It's the one I found dog kibble inside. It's not hard to guess what kind of "water" damaged the speaker.


Close up of the "water" damage. Surprise! MDF, aka cardboard, doesn't like to get wet.


Here it is after removing the worst of the damaged stuff with a chisel and coarse sand paper.

Bondo Wood Filler applied. I filled in the sockets for the grilles because I don't have them and don't plan on making any. I also filled in the seam between the front panel and the rest of the cabinet.

After the first round of sanding. I added a bit more Bondo to fill in the voids and sanded again before  applying the vinyl.

I could have refinished them with more wood-grain vinyl, but there are a lot of other, more interesting options available in the vinyl that's used to wrap cars. I ordered a 5' x 10' roll of 3M 2080 satin flip psychedelic vinyl film from rvinyl for $170. Yes, that's more than I paid for the speakers.


This is the new vinyl.


I wiped the cabinets down with a tack cloth to make sure there was no residue or sanding dust on them and then applied vinyl to the tops and bottoms of the cabinets to get a feel for working with the stuff. It went on easily with minimal effort. I started by peeling the backing from one edge of the vinyl, sticking it to the speaker box, and slowly pulled the backing off the vinyl as I went along. I used a vinyl squeegee to chase out air and apply pressure to the film and followed that with a 2" wide brayer to really press it down. 


The top of one of the speakers after installing the vinyl. I used the flash on the phone to light it up- otherwise it just looks gray.


I left the original black woodgrain vinyl on the backs of the cabinets, but had to wrap the film around the edges at the back and cut the corners at 45 degrees. I used a framing square to get the 45 degree cuts exact.


This is how I got the corner cuts just right.



The back edge of the top of the speaker.


I wrapped a single large piece of vinyl over the sides and front of the speaker. This took a little more effort than the top and bottom, but I had help from my hot girlfriend. Thanks Carol! I started with the speaker box laying on one side, then stuck the film on the other side of the cabinet, then rotated the box onto it's back and covered the front surface, and finally rotated the box again to finish the other side. I used a heat gun in some areas to allow stretching the vinyl over curved parts of the front panel. Once the film was stuck down I used a razor knife to trim the edges and cut the openings for the drivers. I also used the framing square to cut the back corners at 45 degrees as I did on the tops and bottoms of the cabinets.


Here's one of them completely covered with the new vinyl. As you can see, there are many imperfections, but the overall effect is pretty nice. A lot of the rough surface you can see on the front of the speaker was the result of the old vinyl pulling off some of the MDF surface. This is the one that didn't have so much doggy damage.


Finished speakers set up in my bedroom. I'm happy with the results!


More impressive in sunlight:



The speakers weigh about 60 lbs each, so it's very easy to damage the edges if you aren't super careful. I made a CAD model of them because I wanted to print TPU skirts to protect the bottom edge from getting dinged up again by getting bumped by vacuum cleaner, or from moving them around. The skirts will print in two parts for each speaker and go all around the bottom edges of the speakers. I haven't decided if I am going to print and install them...



CAD render of the skirt I designed for the speakers and printed in TPU. It's designed to be stapled to the bottom of the speaker to protect the delicate edges from bumps.




Friday, November 8, 2024

Restoring a 37 Year Old Soundcraftsmen DX4000 Preamp

I recently restored my Soundcraftsmen PM860 amplifier, and was offered a deal on a Soundcraftsmen DX4000 preamp that wasn't quite working. I couldn't find any reviews from the audio press, but plenty were found in some of the audiophile forums, most saying good things. I decided the DX4000 might go well with the PM860, so I bought it.


Front panel of the DX4000, not mine- this one is in a little better shape.


Here's the rear panel of my DX4000. Remember when audio gear had "convenience outlets" on the back?  Those were the days- the days before the marketing people decided audiophiles should buy $1k power cords! Note- no gold plating anywhere!

This preamp has no tone controls, but has three loop I/Os for connecting different signal processors such as equalizers, and two tape loops with switches to dub from one to another. I have never seen a preamp with this much switching before. It also has a headphone amplifier with two 1/4" headphone jacks, one that cuts output to the power amplifier and one that doesn't. One other interesting thing this preamp includes is an output inverter that allows you to connect two stereo power amps in bridged mono mode.

My new preamp had a few problems that were immediately obvious. The top cover had a couple rust spots and bubbling paint. It has a bunch of ganged pushbutton switches that all use the same rectangular button caps, 15 in all. A few of the caps were missing and a few of the remaining ones were cracked. The power-on LED was dead. There was no audio passing through the preamp, except that turning the balance pot made a lot of scratchy noise at the output.

The good news is that I measured the power supply voltages and found the + and -15V regulators working. I also checked all the diodes and found them to be OK. The muting relays were also working properly. There were no burnt parts or exploded caps on the PCB, so I figured worst case I'd need to replace the electrolytic caps (this thing was made in '87) and the opamps (4x RC4136, still readily and cheaply available). There is a MM phono preamp board that has some discrete transistors, but I wasn't too worried about those.

You can access the full size DX4000/4200 schematic diagrams here.



Input switching, one channel shown. See the diagram below to see just how crazy this is.


Tracing signal path from "digital" input on the upper left through output (follow the green line from the upper left to the lower right), the unbuffered input signal passes through 13 sets of switch contacts! That's probably why you don't see this sort of thing done much. The signal passes through 5 switch contacts (blue line) just to get to the tape outputs.


The DX4000 schematic diagram. The phono preamp is at the top, power supply lower left, and line/headphone amp lower right. The DX4000 phono preamp does not include the cartridge matching switches or the op-amp buffer stage.



Power supply schematic with power off. The yellow switches short the power-on LED and the 47 uF cap (red). When power is switched on, the yellow switches open and the LED turns on, and the 47 uF cap (red) charges slowly through the relay coils (about 1k Ohms) and the 2.2M resistor. Once the voltage on that cap gets high enough -it takes about 4 seconds- the transistors (green) switch on, shorting the 2.2M resistor, allowing more current through the relay coils which switches them, connecting the preamp signal to the power amp. This delay prevents turn-on transients from causing the speakers to thump if the power amp is turned on before the preamp. Note: The 17V connections actually sit at 22.8V.

I did some additional testing and found that some audio went through the preamp when I wiggled the input selector buttons on the front panel. I examined the switches closely and found that the solder joints to the PCB were cracked. The single-sided PCB has oversized, unplated holes, and small area pads for the switch pins so you have to really flood the connections with a lot of solder to ensure that it bridges the gaps. Once I resoldered the pins the input switch worked fine. I resoldered all the other switches on the PCB- quite a job, given the number of switches.

Why was the LED dead? Hmmm. The power-on LED is powered via the +/-17V rails (measured +/-22.8V) through the 10k resistor that drops the voltage and limits current through the LED. If the LED has 1.5V across it (typical for red LEDs), the resistor is dropping 44V, which means there should be about 4.4 mA going through the LED. That shouldn't kill the LED. Maybe just an early failure. It happens...


Yikes! Wirewrap connections were used at the I/O jacks and on the PCB. Most of those wires were stuffed under the PCB- I pulled them out so I could inspect the underside of the PCB. Like the PM860, there is no silk-screen layer indicating part numbers or values on the PCB. Soundcraftsmen didn't believe in keeping connections short or using shielded cable! Was wire wrap really cheaper than soldering?


Side note: to me, this preamp looks like the kind of electronics projects I did when I was in high school. My web searches indicate that the DX4000 cost $499 when it was new in 1988. Adcom's GFP565 preamp from around the same era sold for $800 new. I realize that's a significant price difference, but compare the photo above to the photo below. Which looks more serviceable? Which looks less likely to require service? Which looks like it was designed and assembled by professionals? There really is no comparison. This is similar to the difference between the Soundcraftsmen PM860 and Krell KAV-300i amplifiers I recently recapped. Sometimes it is worth the extra money that some items cost, even if the specs are essentially the same, and even if you can't hear a difference between the items being compared.


Adcom GFP565 preamp, sold at the same time as the DX4000. Today you can buy the Soundcraftsmen DX4000 on ebay for $150-470 depending on condition. You can get the Adcom GFP565 for $250-500. I know which I would rather have, just based on the build quality.




Underside of the PCB, not much to see here, except for the dozens of switch contacts that had to be resoldered.



Parts circled in green are electrolytic caps. Opamp ICs are circled in red. The two blue caps near the center are nonpolar electrolytic coupling caps. The two gray things in the upper right corner are muting relays. The 470uF bypass caps for the opamps are located near the power supply on the left, far from the opamps that are all located to the right. Hmmm.





Recapped phono preamp board, electrolytic caps circled in red. I replaced the two orange, 0.39uF, electrolytic input coupling caps with film caps (white caps in blue circles). The two red caps circled in blue are film caps that replaced four electrolytics wired as nonpolar parts.



This is the active circuit schematic for the DX4000. The phono preamp does not have the cartridge matching switches or the phono gain stage shown. Electrolytic caps are marked in yellow. Only one channel is shown. There are some differences between the schematic of the phono preamp section (upper left) and the parts on my PCBs. 


Modification


For some reason, the designer chose to power only the phono preamp board from the regulated +/- 15V rails, and the op-amps from unregulated +/- 17V (schematic designation). These op-amps, like most, are specced at +/-15V operation (data sheet here), with absolute maximum of +/- 18V.  The actual voltage on the "17V" rails is 22.8V. There are 220 Ohm dropping resistors between the op-amp power connections and the 17V rails that will drop that voltage a bit. I measured +/-17.4V at the opamps which (in my opinion) is too close to the 18V spec limit. 

I saw a similar thing in the PM860 amp where the main power supply filter caps were rated for 75V and there was about 72V on the rails. That's not a lot of margin. Let's say the line voltage was a little higher than normal, or there was some momentary surge on the power line. Where are those voltages going to go? What's going to happen to those caps and op-amps? Why on earth would a sensible engineer do this?

I considered connecting the op-amps to the +/- 15V regulated rails, but thought there could be some problem with putting the opamps on the same 15V rails with the phono preamp, so I decided to add a second dual 15V regulator specifically to power the op-amps. 

I installed a 15V regulator module that uses LM317T and LM337T regulator chips with a few external parts to provide regulated +/- 15V from input voltages over +/-18V or so. There will be plenty of headroom to maintain regulation because the module is powered by the +/- 22.8V that is present on the 17V rails. Each op-amp IC uses 6 mA at idle, and there are 4 of them, so 24 mA nominal load for the regulators (which squares with the measured voltage drops across the 220 Ohm resistors). That's more than enough to meet the regulator's minimal output current requirement of 10 mA.

The modification is simple. Take out the two 220 Ohm dropping resistors that sit between the 17V (actually 22.8V) rails and the op-amps and replace them with the new 15V regulators. The regulator ground connects to the preamp ground at the ground wirewrap stake. I used a drop of hot-melt glue to hold the regulator module down on the preamp PCB. 


The two 220 Ohm resistors (red) get removed, and the 15V regulator module replaces them. 


New power supply filter caps (big ones circled in red on the left)- 4x 2200 uF @ 35V, and new +/- 15V regulator module (green circle) to power the opamps. The regulator board is held in place with a drop of hot-melt glue. The regulators simply replaced the 220 Ohm dropping resistors. The white wire from the regulator board is the ground connection for the regulators and connects to the preamp ground wirewrap stake. The regulator chips on the new module don't need heatsinks as they are minimally loaded by the op-amps, even when driving headphones. Note- the original regulators are in place and operational- they supply +/-15V to the phono preamp board.



New electrolytic caps and the +/-15V regulator board that was added to power the op-amps. The regulators replace the 220 Ohm dropping resistors that were used to drop the 22.8V down to 17.4V.



The RC4136 quad op-amps used have reasonably good specs, but the pinout isn't typical of most quad op-amps. Some audiophiles would prefer to use better, lower noise, wider bandwidth parts. You can buy little plug-in adapter boards that allow you to use more modern, higher spec op-amps, but that would add another $100 to the cost of restoring this preamp. You'd be changing the op-amps, but there's still the lack of bypass caps, the funky wiring, and all those switch contacts to go through. I doubt changing the op-amps is going to result in improved sound quality when you're starting from such a marginal design.


What About the Buttons?


I searched page after page of switch cap listings at Digikey and Mouser and could not find a same-size replacement for the missing and cracked switch caps. I decided to 3D print them.

I measured one of the un-cracked buttons and the posts on the switches and came up with this design in about 30 seconds:


Back side of the 3D printable button cap. The cutout in the center fits tightly over the switch post. I printed these using TPU filament so it would flex a bit and grip the switch post tightly. They probably won't work if you print with a hard filament like PLA, ABS, or PETG.


The button is slightly tapered like the originals. The original caps had concave tops but I went with a flat surface for the sake of print quality. I printed test buttons with the fronts and backs on the printer's bed. In the end I went with the front-up prints to get a smooth surface on the visible and touchable part of the button.


One of the printed button caps. I used TPU filament and it grips the post on the switch tightly and will never crack like the original button caps. This and the the other 14 were printed in 0.15 mm layers. I printed a set in green and another in orange to see which I preferred.

This is what it looks like with all the printed button caps installed:


I went with a red LED so it would be clearly visible among the green button caps. I added orange caps to the input selector switches.


If you need to print buttons like this you can DL the fusion360 file here or just grab the STL file here. TPU tends to be hairy and blobby stuff, so plan on spending a few minutes cleaning them up with a wire clipper after printing. 

Does it Work?


After about an hour of testing all the I/O paths, I can report that everything is working fine. There's no noise from either the volume or balance pots. Music sounds clear and undistorted.






Thursday, October 24, 2024

A new, new amplifier: Advance Paris A12 Classic

The A12 front panel. Yes, those are tubes in there! 


I only recently started buying new gear for my stereo system as opposed to my habit of buying (and sometimes fixing) used gear. In July I bought an SVS 3000 Micro subwoofer to go with a pair of Canton Ergo 22DC bookshelf speakers my brother gave me. And more recently, I splurged on an $80 SMSL SU-1 DAC and an Advance Paris A12 Classic integrated amplifier. 

I got the SU-1 DAC to connect my TV PC to the stereo system before I decided to buy the A12 amp. More on that DAC, here. 

I've been using an LG sound bar with the TV, but have grown unsatisfied with its performance, especially with regard to dialog that I frequently can't understand. The sound quality from the stereo system is so much better than the sound bar, that it almost hurts to use the sound bar any more. It seems redundant to have the sound bar and the stereo system in the living room, so I thought it would be best to connect the TV to the stereo system and get rid of the sound bar. That means I need an amp that has HDMI ARC input. The Krell KAV-300i that I recently recapped, and has been powering the stereo system is a great integrated amp, but it only has analog inputs.

I am not a true-believer when it comes to audio gear. I trust measured specs more than subjective reviews full of purple verbiage. To me an amp is an amp, as long as it isn't poorly built and has adequate power to drive the speakers. Any subtle differences that may exist in sound character will be minor (especially compared to differences in speakers and their room interactions) and I probably won't be able to hear them (see my recent listening test of the SU-1 DAC vs 30 year old VRDS-20 CD player), or will quickly get used to them. 

I look for adequate power output, ability to drive low impedance loads (because who knows what speakers I may end up with), adequate input/output capability, quality of construction which includes components and layout, and near the bottom of the list, the way it looks. With a lot of high end audio amplifiers, you pay a lot for artistically machining the amp's face plate, or maybe even the whole chassis. Some look really spectacular, but that's just not how I want to spend my money.

I looked at a lot of different integrated 2 channel amplifiers to see if any had HDMI ARC inputs. There aren't many out there, unless you want to go full surround-sound with 5-17 amplifier channels and speakers. I saw the Advance Paris A10 and A12 amplifiers and really liked their I/O capability. I found a deal on an open-box A12 that was only about $200 more than a new A10, so I ordered the A12. Either one would more than meet my requirements.


Rear view of the A12. There are eight analog inputs, two of which are balanced. Among the inputs is one for MC or MM phono cartridges, with selectable gain and load capacitance. There are also eleven digital inputs, including three optical, three coaxial, two USB, and two HDMI jacks. There's a balanced preamp output, two outputs for subwoofers with selectable LPFs, and two headphone jacks with selectable gains and output impedances. Note: this is not my amp. I found this photo online. Look closely at the labeling under the speaker connectors. It says "A or B Speakers Impedance: 4-16 Ohms" and A+B Speakers Impedance: 6-16 Ohms". My amp says "A or B Speakers Impedance 8-16 Ohms" and "A+B Speakers Impedance: 16 Ohms". It's a mystery!

Since I have a subwoofer, one feature of this amp that I am especially interested in is bass management. There are two subwoofer outputs on the back of the amplifier with switches to control the LPF cutoff frequency at either 75Hz (for larger speakers) or 150 Hz (for smaller speakers, such as my Canton Ergos, though they really should be OK down to 45 Hz). The spec sheet and manual don't say much about bass management. Do the subwoofer outputs switch on and off with the speakers? What is the slope of the roll off? Does it also apply high pass to the A12 amplifier stage  I sent an email to Advance Paris asking these questions and got no response. Hmmm.

The corner frequencies for bass management are pretty high, so I don't think they are intended to be used with just an amp/speaker sub. It will need to have its own LPF that you can set to match the main speaker's low frequency cutoff, otherwise you'll have both the sub and the speakers response curves overlapping over a relatively wide frequency range and that could cause some room/system frequency response problems.

I also liked the preamp-out/power-amp-in I/Os. That can be useful for doing stuff like bi/tri-amping a system or adding an equalizer (though it might be better to connect an equalizer to the tape out/amp in). There is no jumper on the back of the amp to connect the preamp output to the power amp input, just a menu selection on the front panel that turns the power amp input on. Does it also turn off the preamp? 


Advance Who?


Advance Paris is a French company, with manufacturing in China, like many many brands of audio gear, including some uber high-end stuff. They've been making audio gear since 1995 and selling mostly in the EU. They recently started marketing world-wide, including the US. 

The look of the A12 has been compared to McIntosh, and they are similar, but I think the A12 has updated that look. 


McIntosh MA12000 hybrid integrated amplifier. Notice any similarities to the A12? Two big meters, tubes visible between them (backlit in green here), knobs and a digital dot matrix display. In this model there are handles, but in other products there are always a couple vertical metal bars along the left and right edges of the front panel.

I'm not entirely sure I like the way the A12 looks - it reminds me of futuristic kitchen appliance that you might see in a 50 or 60s era sci-fi movie. Not that that's bad... Hey, maybe it will go well with my 3D printed Sci-Fi Lamp! Maybe I need to print another with a blue shade to match the VU meters in the amp. We'll see if the design grows on me when I've had the amp for a while.


Sci-Fi Lamp, printed on UMMD using 1mm nozzle and PETG filament. The shade is two identical prints, one green and one transparent edge-glow glass. The red parts are actually 15 identical pieces, stacked inside the shade pieces.

The A12 has a dual-mono (meaning that each channel has its own power supply) class AB power amp that delivers 190 W/ch into 8 Ohms and 280 W/ch into 4 Ohms, so it should be able to drive just about any speakers ever made (more on that, below). A lot of newer amplifiers are class-D circuits, which tend to be small and very efficient, but I'm not so sure about their reliability. I found the full digital amplifier in the Technics SU-G700 interesting, but the Stereophile measurements turned me off - they looked great except for lots of ultrasonic noise in the output. It also doesn't have HDMI input. Maybe the next generation...

The DAC that's built into the A12 is a PCM1796 made by Texas Instruments (originally Burr-Brown, bought by TI in 2000). That chip has been around for over 20 years, and it may not measure as well as some of the newer chips from AKM or ESS, but are the differences audible? Maybe to some, but probably not to me. When you run the incredible SINAD signal from a modern DAC through relatively noisy tubes, does the DAC's high performance really matter?

Yes, the A12 has tubes. For many people that's a selling point, but I'm not sure if it's good or bad. Some people think tubes have a euphonic sound. In the A12 the tubes are biased in class A in the preamp section of the amplifier. If tubes have a "sound", I'd guess it's from noise and distortion- they tend to produce even-order harmonics that for some reason sound nicer than the odd order harmonics produced by bipolar transistors. But in a preamp you're probably not going to drive the tubes hard enough to distort audibly, so is there really going to be a difference in the sound other than a poorer S/N? Another different "sound" you might get with tubes is microphonics. That happens when the tubes vibrate. Small changes in the physical position of the elements in the tubes cause changes in capacitance and that can modulate the audio signal. If it gets severe enough (maybe by turning the volume up to 11 so the subwoofer vibrates everything in the room) it can actually cause oscillation.

The tubes are 12AT7 or ECC81 type made by JJ Electronic. That type is still made by more than one company and not too expensive, and should last many years before they need to be replaced, so they're not too much of a problem in that regard. Some tube audio fanatics are into "tube rolling" which means trying tubes by different manufacturers, or old stock tubes, to see if one sounds better than another. I don't suffer from that affliction.


Construction

You know, I hate audio equipment reviews that don't show me the insides of the unit being reviewed. To me, quality of construction is a much more important factor in deciding whether to buy than the looks of the front panel. Why don't more reviewers open up the gear they review? Maybe their agreements with the equipment maker prohibit them from showing off the guts. 

Well, I have no such agreement! You're going to see pictures of the guts here.

There are good ways to build electronics and some not so good ways. Here's an example of not-so-good- this is an 80's vintage Soundcraftsmen DX4000 preamp that I recently recapped and sold on ebay. All the I/O switching is done with switches mounted on the front panel, with long wires from the connectors on the back panel. Does it work? Sure. Do I want to buy something like that, at any price, even if it specs well? Nope.


No! This is not the A12! It's a 1988 Soundcraftsmen DX4000 preamp. Can you imagine wiring this? or repairing it? Honestly, it looks like something I would have built when I was in high school and couldn't afford proper tools or parts.


Here's an example of more preferable build quality- the Krell KAV-300i amplifier:

This is more like what I want. This amp wasn't without its problems, but this type of construction is a big improvement over the Soundcraftsmen preamp in the previous photo. The I/O switching is done by relays at the back of the amp, very close to the connectors. There aren't a lot of wires running all over the place. 

As of this writing, there aren't many photos of the internals of the A12 online, but what I can find looks like good quality construction. Everything looks modular with PCBs used to connect them together, and minimal cabling.

One of the few images showing internals that I was able to find. 


In this video from Advance Paris, at about 4 minutes in, you can see some of the insides of what might be an A12. It looks well laid out, and I see many small relays used to switch signals, similar to the Krell KAV-300i amplifier. I also see some Bennic XPP series film caps used instead of nonpolar electrolytics. While there are many surface mount parts on the PCBs, it looks like the electrolytic caps are through-hole type that will be relatively easy to replace in 20-30 years when they start failing (assuming they last that long, and that radial lead electrolytic caps are still available in 20-30 years). Nice!

 

More reviews (you may need to translate):

https://www.hifitest.de/test/vollverstaerker/advance-paris-a12-classic-22057

https://www.on-mag.fr/index.php/topaudio/tests-auditions/24521-test-ampli-hifi-advance-paris-a12-classic-une-oeuvre-musicale-complete-et-imposante

https://www.whathifi.com/reviews/advance-paris-a12-classic


Video reviews in French:  

https://youtu.be/-pFpBgrVjsM?si=2d2rLTvVqJLoVSOG

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0v3YV-tX0MQ


It's Here!


When the amp arrived, I connected B&W 703 S3 speakers and a CD player to both the balanced analog and a coax digital inputs on the amp, and a Squeezebox Touch to another coax input. Everything sounded great, and worked perfectly. Then I tried connecting my TV to the HDMI ARC input. That's when things turned not so great.

I managed to get the HDMI ARC input working a couple times, but have no idea why it started to work and why it stopped. I emailed AP about it, and got a reply within an hour (great!), that the amp is stereo only and I should disable all surround sound multichannel audio capabilities in the source. It would be nice if they included that sort of info in the manual!

I have an Nvidia Shield TV Pro (STVP) connected to my TV via HDMI because the STVP has better video upscaling than the upscaling built into the TV.  I have been using the HDMI ARC connection on the TV to connect to an LG Dolby Atmos sound bar, and it was all working fine. After the email from Advance Paris, I went through both the STVP and the TVs setup menus and disabled all multichannel audio. 

I messed with it and messed with it, and changed settings, powered down and back up, etc. and could not get it to work. I tried connecting the TV audio to the amp via optical fiber and it worked without and problems, so that's probably how I'm going to use it. Maybe they'll update the manual or there will be a forum with info online somewhere. For now, optical is the way to go.

After a bit more research, I found that LG TVs frequently have problems with HDMI, so it may not be the amp's fault.


Photos and some details


I wanted to take pictures from the top and bottom sides, but after removing the top cover, realized that the bottom cover is part of the chassis structure and I'd have to take the whole thing apart to get the bottom off. It seems it is intended to be serviced from the top side only, which requires removing a bunch of stuff I'm not willing to remove right now, so the photos are mostly taken from the top side.

The binding posts on the output are very heavy, and seem to be very good quality. The posts are 7 mm in diameter and the vertical holes that you might insert raw cable or pin plugs into are 3.7 mm in diameter. You can also insert banana plugs into the ends of the posts, and they seem to grip well (with my bananas, anyway).

The power transformers are 120 mm D x 80 mm H. There are multiple windings all called out on the label. The power amp is powered by a dual 46.5V @ 2.5A windings. There are four, big amplifier filter caps (2 for each channel), each is 12,000 uF @ 80V. It looks like all the electrolytic caps are made by Decon and all (everywhere in the amp) appear to be rated for 105C operation, which is good because this amplifier runs warm. It looks like all the electrolytic caps in this amp are through-hole type, easy to replace when the time comes.

For those who aren't aware, electrolytic caps have finite lifetime, usually specified as something like "2000 hours at 105C, max voltage, and max ripple current". That doesn't sound like long, but operating at less than that temperature, voltage, and ripple current extends the operating life. For every 10C below the maximum temp, lifetime essentially doubles, so operating at 45C (about where this amp seems to sit most of the time) multiplies the operating life by 2^6= 64x, which means the caps should last 64 x 2000 hours= 128,000 hours. That's equivalent to 8 hours per day for 16,000 days or 43.8 years.

The tube preamp is on its own PCB and it looks like you have to remove 4 screws and a couple cables to get it out of the amp. Access to the tubes would then be from the front side, I think. There's a metal cover over the tubes that is soldered to the PCB that holds the LEDs that light up the tubes (you didn't think that light came from the tubes, did you?), so you won't be removing that cover when it is time to change the tubes (hopefully many years from now). There are a couple nuts on top of the metal cover that have some shellac on top. If you look closely into the tube window you can see what looks like conical springs that appear to keep the tubes pushed down in their sockets. I think those shellacked nuts are on the ends of the springs.

There are 6 output transistors bolted to the heatsinks in each channel. I can't see the numbers on them.


Inconsistencies and information needed


The manual is lacking in some critical details. There's nothing about how to use the HDMI ports, it doesn't specify exactly what the hi-bias switch does, it doesn't explain whether the preamp is still functional if you turn on the power amp input (could be useful for biamping). It doesn't say if the tubes are on the preamp or power amp side of the power amp input. 

I tried to use the HDMI port to connect my TV to the stereo system and ran into a lot of trouble. I emailed AP about it and they responded within and hour (!), telling me to be sure to turn off all surround sound capabilities in the source component (the TV and Shield TV Pro that I use) because the HDMI ports in the A12 are only 2 channel capable. I did that and tried again, and it still wouldn't connect consistently. I'd try it in the morning and it wouldn't work, but by evening it was working for some reason. I switched to one of the optical inputs which worked perfectly on first attempt, and will try messing with HDMI again in the future.

The specs on the web site say the amp can deliver 190W/ch into 8 Ohms and 280 W/ch into 4 Ohms, but two different versions of the amp seem to exist, one in which the speaker terminal labels say 4 Ohms is OK and one that says the minimum speaker impedance is 8 Ohms. I have posted a large photo of the back side of an A12 (above) that shows the 4 Ohm minimum impedance. The back of my amp says 8 Ohms minimum.

The manual says there's a USB driver that can be downloaded at the AP web site, but I was unable to find it. I haven't tried the USB input yet. 

I did find a firmware update for the amp on the web site and successfully installed it without any trouble by following the procedure detailed in the English language readme file that was zipped with the update file. The V1.6 update adds a function to always power up with a user specified volume level instead of defaulting to the volume that was set when powering the amp down the last time it was used.

The update file is not found under the "downloads" tab at the web site. It's on the A12 page under the "documents" link, labeled "mise a jour V1.6"


A12 with the top cover off. There are 11 screws that hold the top cover in place.


The back panel (gold) is a structural component, as is the bottom pan (black). There's no taking the bottom off without taking most of the amp apart.


One of the two power transformers in the A12. I would guess that the 210V windings are used to bias the vacuum tubes. The 46.5V 2.5A windings are powering the power amplifier.


The tube preamp board. The tubes are located inside the metal box at the top of the image. It looks like there are 4 cables and 4 screws that have to be removed to take the preamp board out and to access the tubes. The metal cover over the tubes is soldered to the circuit board.


The tube preamp board appears to be held down by 4 screws, one of which is seen near the center of this image. The other boxed area is one of the two shellacked nuts that hold the tube hold-downs in place.


The small HDMI board sits on top of the larger digital input/DAC board.


This is the HDMI board.


The Digital input/DAC board. You can see the PCM1796 DAC chip and some NE5532A opamps among the parts.


The left side (viewed from front) meter board.


The right side meter board.



Speaker binding posts. Good quality, can handle pin plugs, banana plugs, wire or spade lugs.

If anyone has any questions, ask away. I'll try to answer.