I recently restored my Soundcraftsmen PM860 amplifier, and was offered a deal on a Soundcraftsmen DX4000 preamp that wasn't quite working. I couldn't find any reviews from the audio press, but plenty were found in some of the audiophile forums, most saying good things. I decided the DX4000 might go well with the PM860, so I bought it.
Front panel of the DX4000, not mine- this one is in a little better shape. |
This preamp has no tone controls, but has three loop I/Os for connecting different signal processors such as equalizers, and two tape loops with switches to dub from one to another. I have never seen a preamp with this much switching before. It also has a headphone amplifier with two 1/4" headphone jacks, one that cuts output to the power amplifier and one that doesn't. One other interesting thing this preamp includes is an output inverter that allows you to connect two stereo power amps in bridged mono mode.
My new preamp had a few problems that were immediately obvious. The top cover had a couple rust spots and bubbling paint. It has a bunch of ganged pushbutton switches that all use the same rectangular button caps, 15 in all. A few of the caps were missing and a few of the remaining ones were cracked. The power-on LED was dead. There was no audio passing through the preamp, except that turning the balance pot made a lot of scratchy noise at the output.
The good news is that I measured the power supply voltages and found the + and -15V regulators working. I also checked all the diodes and found them to be OK. The muting relays were also working properly. There were no burnt parts or exploded caps on the PCB, so I figured worst case I'd need to replace the electrolytic caps (this thing was made in '87) and the opamps (4x RC4136, still readily and cheaply available). There is a MM phono preamp board that has some discrete transistors, but I wasn't too worried about those.
You can access the full size DX4000/4200 schematic diagrams here.
Input switching, one channel shown. See the diagram below to see just how crazy this is. |
I did some additional testing and found that some audio went through the preamp when I wiggled the input selector buttons on the front panel. I examined the switches closely and found that the solder joints to the PCB were cracked. The single-sided PCB has oversized, unplated holes, and small area pads for the switch pins so you have to really flood the connections with a lot of solder to ensure that it bridges the gaps. Once I resoldered the pins the input switch worked fine. I resoldered all the other switches on the PCB- quite a job, given the number of switches.
Why was the LED dead? Hmmm. The power-on LED is powered via the +/-17V rails (measured +/-22.8V) through the 10k resistor that drops the voltage and limits current through the LED. If the LED has 1.5V across it (typical for red LEDs), the resistor is dropping 44V, which means there should be about 4.4 mA going through the LED. That shouldn't kill the LED. Maybe just an early failure. It happens...
Side note: to me, this preamp looks like the kind of electronics projects I did when I was in high school. My web searches indicate that the DX4000 cost $499 when it was new in 1988. Adcom's GFP565 preamp from around the same era sold for $800 new. I realize that's a significant price difference, but compare the photo above to the photo below. Which looks more serviceable? Which looks less likely to require service? Which looks like it was designed and assembled by professionals? There really is no comparison. This is similar to the difference between the Soundcraftsmen PM860 and Krell KAV-300i amplifiers I recently recapped. Sometimes it is worth the extra money that some items cost, even if the specs are essentially the same, and even if you can't hear a difference between the items being compared.
Underside of the PCB, not much to see here, except for the dozens of switch contacts that had to be resoldered. |
Modification
I saw a similar thing in the PM860 amp where the main power supply filter caps were rated for 75V and there was about 72V on the rails. That's not a lot of margin. Let's say the line voltage was a little higher than normal, or there was some momentary surge on the power line. Where are those voltages going to go? What's going to happen to those caps and op-amps? Why on earth would a sensible engineer do this?
I considered connecting the op-amps to the +/- 15V regulated rails, but thought there could be some problem with putting the opamps on the same 15V rails with the phono preamp, so I decided to add a second dual 15V regulator specifically to power the op-amps.
I installed a 15V regulator module that uses LM317T and LM337T regulator chips with a few external parts to provide regulated +/- 15V from input voltages over +/-18V or so. There will be plenty of headroom to maintain regulation because the module is powered by the +/- 22.8V that is present on the 17V rails. Each op-amp IC uses 6 mA at idle, and there are 4 of them, so 24 mA nominal load for the regulators (which squares with the measured voltage drops across the 220 Ohm resistors). That's more than enough to meet the regulator's minimal output current requirement of 10 mA.
The modification is simple. Take out the two 220 Ohm dropping resistors that sit between the 17V (actually 22.8V) rails and the op-amps and replace them with the new 15V regulators. The regulator ground connects to the preamp ground at the ground wirewrap stake. I used a drop of hot-melt glue to hold the regulator module down on the preamp PCB.
New electrolytic caps and the +/-15V regulator board that was added to power the op-amps. The regulators replace the 220 Ohm dropping resistors that were used to drop the 22.8V down to 17.4V. |
What About the Buttons?
I searched page after page of switch cap listings at Digikey and Mouser and could not find a same-size replacement for the missing and cracked switch caps. I decided to 3D print them.
I measured one of the un-cracked buttons and the posts on the switches and came up with this design in about 30 seconds:
The button is slightly tapered like the originals. The original caps had concave tops but I went with a flat surface for the sake of print quality. I printed test buttons with the fronts and backs on the printer's bed. In the end I went with the front-up prints to get a smooth surface on the visible and touchable part of the button.
This is what it looks like with all the printed button caps installed:
I went with a red LED so it would be clearly visible among the green button caps. I added orange caps to the input selector switches. |
Does it Work?
After about an hour of testing all the I/O paths, I can report that everything is working fine. There's no noise from either the volume or balance pots. Music sounds clear and undistorted.
Nice restoration Mark! I particularly like your funky green and orange replacement button caps. I have no idea what the original designers were thinking when they made this; the internal construction really is poor and driving the op-amps from the unregulated supply right at their maximum working voltage can only be described as ill conceived.
ReplyDeleteThanks! Yeah, the op-amps powered at the edge of their specs was the last straw for me. I don't like the I/O wiring, the switching, or the circuit. I sold it on ebay.
Delete